- #CREATIVE CLOUD LIGHTROOM RECOMMENDED SPECS UPDATE#
- #CREATIVE CLOUD LIGHTROOM RECOMMENDED SPECS PATCH#
- #CREATIVE CLOUD LIGHTROOM RECOMMENDED SPECS DOWNLOAD#
- #CREATIVE CLOUD LIGHTROOM RECOMMENDED SPECS MAC#
I too tried Exposure - I thought the highlight and shadow controls really sucked when compared to Lr or C1 so I dumped it.Adobe has officially released Lightroom in the Microsoft Store, and while this launch is a notable moment for both Microsoft and Adobe, users have a different reason to be happy about it: Lightroom can be installed without the need for Creating Cloud.Īdobe apps are typically offered through the Creative Cloud app, but given Lightroom is thus available from the Microsoft Store, being logged in with a Microsoft account is all you need to download this version. The fact that you do not have to import into it does not mean the database is not there.
It does really, it has a database where it stores all sorts of information so it can find your files. Incidentally you say Exposure does not have a DAM or catalogue.
#CREATIVE CLOUD LIGHTROOM RECOMMENDED SPECS PATCH#
The new masking tools are not a patch on Lr either - just my opinion of course I too tried Exposure - I thought the highlight and shadow controls really sucked when compared to Lr or C1 so I dumped it. I have tried many alternatives, especially when subscription came along, but I always end up back here. If your machine meets the grade there really is not a problem with the Adobe suite. I tend to shy away from the minimum configuration as that will always be right on the line.
Read the specification requirements as published by Adobe and see if you fit.
#CREATIVE CLOUD LIGHTROOM RECOMMENDED SPECS MAC#
An M1 Mac is the new none intel Mac so the specs are not relevant to Windows - it uses ram/cpu differently. Either way it certainly is not an issue now. It might have been though and others here will know more. I am not are the catalogue was ever an issue and I have used Lr since V1. I just checked and it is running at 4% and 37% now (about normal maybe a little ligh for ram). Well, I have noticed it on other computers, but the most recent reason I say that is on my desktop (where I installed it, this time) task manager showed 70% of my cpu and 60% of my ram. If it is this light during normal background use, then I think I may do that. But I was thinking about switching back to Lr, because I can just make a catalog for each year, instead of having one that goes back 10 years (and has almost 100k images on it). That is one reason I had switched to exposure x4 originally. However, I HAVE had lightroom bog down when I was using it (especially with large catalogs).
#CREATIVE CLOUD LIGHTROOM RECOMMENDED SPECS UPDATE#
I understand that it wants to update and sync in the background, and totally get that it needs resources WHEN I USE IT, but that it still runs in the background now, is beyond me (there is no need for it to run in the background after I turn all that off). So the system is decent and MUCH better than the laptop I used Lr and Ps on before (which really had the updates and stuff bog it down). I have a ryzen 3400g APU, 32gb RAM SSD boot drive, and no GPU. All the startup, all the updates, and all the syncing (which I have no need for atm). But right now, I have EVERYTHING that I can turn off in CC off. So I guess it was during installation it was running high. Click to expand.Well, I have noticed it on other computers, but the most recent reason I say that is on my desktop (where I installed it, this time) task manager showed 70% of my cpu and 60% of my ram.
0 kommentar(er)
